Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:38:00 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: architecture question
Message-ID:	<20010409133800.A31564@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08EEC9 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08EEC9@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:12:46PM +1000

On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:12:46PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>Chris,
>	Some of the pthread code is really just calling the correct
>function, and could easily be implemented as a macro if the appropriate
>headers were included in the userland programs...
>
>Is there someway to get the same result without forcing the inclusion of
>windows headers?

I don't see how.  I think I feel more comfortable with functions, though,
anyway.  It's easier to fix things if we do find something wrong with
the implementation.

cgf

- Raw text -