Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:38:00 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: architecture question Message-ID: <20010409133800.A31564@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: ; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:12:46PM +1000 On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:12:46PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >Chris, > Some of the pthread code is really just calling the correct >function, and could easily be implemented as a macro if the appropriate >headers were included in the userland programs... > >Is there someway to get the same result without forcing the inclusion of >windows headers? I don't see how. I think I feel more comfortable with functions, though, anyway. It's easier to fix things if we do find something wrong with the implementation. cgf