Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3D78DAA5.1070002@netscape.net>
Date:	Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:41:09 -0400
From:	Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT netscape DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Gee, everyone, thanks for the support
References:	<20020906150721 DOT GA22183 AT redhat DOT com> <1031329271 DOT 9096 DOT 49 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020906163701 DOT GL21699 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:

>On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 02:21:11AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 01:07, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>>You know, I really could care less about this damn WINVER thing except
>>>for the fact that I think that w32api developers are being inconsistent.
>>>
>>I don't even care that much. What annoys me is the [temporary] breakage
>>to cygwin - which is where the bug report was raised in the first place.
>>
>>JM2c.
>>
>
>Good point.  Earnie, since you're a member of cygwin-developers, why did
>you allow this to happen?
>
Well I *tried* to tell him, but he just wouldn't listen to reason...

Cheers,
Nicholas

- Raw text -