Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3D78DAA5.1070002@netscape.net> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:41:09 -0400 From: Nicholas Wourms User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Gee, everyone, thanks for the support References: <20020906150721 DOT GA22183 AT redhat DOT com> <1031329271 DOT 9096 DOT 49 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020906163701 DOT GL21699 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 02:21:11AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >>On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 01:07, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>>You know, I really could care less about this damn WINVER thing except >>>for the fact that I think that w32api developers are being inconsistent. >>> >>I don't even care that much. What annoys me is the [temporary] breakage >>to cygwin - which is where the bug report was raised in the first place. >> >>JM2c. >> > >Good point. Earnie, since you're a member of cygwin-developers, why did >you allow this to happen? > Well I *tried* to tell him, but he just wouldn't listen to reason... Cheers, Nicholas