Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<007601c20317$b09374a0$6132bc3e@BABEL>
From:	"Conrad Scott" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20020524054505 DOT GA12651 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: has anyone run the test suite recently?
Date:	Fri, 24 May 2002 12:39:38 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

"Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
> If anyone has the time, I'd be interested in seeing if there
> are any regressions from 1.3.10 an the latest snapshot/cvs.
>
> cgf

Does this correspond to running 'make check'? If so, that ran fine last
night (tho' I've not got a log file to hand). I can easily re-generate this
if you're interested.

I did notice that if I compiled cygwin (i.e. the dll and so forth) with the
current release (1.3.10-1) installed on my machine, I got a sequence of
problems with the tests. But if I installed a newly built copy of cygwin and
*then* re-built and re-tested the same source tree, it all passed fine. I'll
try this again and preserve some log files.

// Conrad

- Raw text -