Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <007601c20317$b09374a0$6132bc3e@BABEL>
From: "Conrad Scott" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20020524054505 DOT GA12651 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: has anyone run the test suite recently?
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 12:39:38 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

"Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
> If anyone has the time, I'd be interested in seeing if there
> are any regressions from 1.3.10 an the latest snapshot/cvs.
>
> cgf

Does this correspond to running 'make check'? If so, that ran fine last
night (tho' I've not got a log file to hand). I can easily re-generate this
if you're interested.

I did notice that if I compiled cygwin (i.e. the dll and so forth) with the
current release (1.3.10-1) installed on my machine, I got a sequence of
problems with the tests. But if I installed a newly built copy of cygwin and
*then* re-built and re-tested the same source tree, it all passed fine. I'll
try this again and preserve some log files.

// Conrad