Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 22 May 2002 11:31:37 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Should sys/types.h include sys/sysmacros.h?
Message-ID:	<20020522153137.GC1739@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020522111439 DOT GA2124 AT tishler DOT net> <GBEGLOMMCLDACBPKDIHFIEEMCIAA DOT gsw AT agere DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<GBEGLOMMCLDACBPKDIHFIEEMCIAA.gsw@agere.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:02:58AM -0400, Gerald S. Williams wrote:
>Jason Tishler wrote:
>> AFAICT, cygwin/types.h did *not* include sys/sysmacros.h until the
>> following:
>>     http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2002-q2/msg00048.html
>
>You're right about that--I was comparing against CVS since my installed
>copy had already been patched.  So the _POSIX_THREADS restriction
>wasn't causing your problem (though it still looks fishy and there are
>times where you want to define it).  Other than that issue, it looks
>like the problem's already fixed.

Is that really surprising?  Jason sent his initial message on 2002-05-01
and it is now 2002-05-22.

cgf

- Raw text -