Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 11:31:37 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Should sys/types.h include sys/sysmacros.h?
Message-ID: <20020522153137.GC1739@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020522111439 DOT GA2124 AT tishler DOT net> <GBEGLOMMCLDACBPKDIHFIEEMCIAA DOT gsw AT agere DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <GBEGLOMMCLDACBPKDIHFIEEMCIAA.gsw@agere.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:02:58AM -0400, Gerald S. Williams wrote:
>Jason Tishler wrote:
>> AFAICT, cygwin/types.h did *not* include sys/sysmacros.h until the
>> following:
>>     http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2002-q2/msg00048.html
>
>You're right about that--I was comparing against CVS since my installed
>copy had already been patched.  So the _POSIX_THREADS restriction
>wasn't causing your problem (though it still looks fishy and there are
>times where you want to define it).  Other than that issue, it looks
>like the problem's already fixed.

Is that really surprising?  Jason sent his initial message on 2002-05-01
and it is now 2002-05-22.

cgf