Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 01 May 2002 13:12:18 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Should sys/types.h include sys/sysmacros.h?
In-reply-to:	<20020501145706.GF6736@redhat.com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id:	<20020501171218.GH3160@tishler.net>
MIME-version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.24i
References:	<20020501125600 DOT GE3160 AT tishler DOT net>
	<20020501145706 DOT GF6736 AT redhat DOT com>

Chris,

On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:57:06AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 08:56:00AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >Should newlib's sys/types.h include sys/sysmacros.h (possibly only for
> >Cygwin)?
>
> If it makes things more linux compliant and there is no corresponding
> susv2 ruling, then go for it.

Cool.

> Could you send a patch to the newlib mailing list?

Yes, that was my plan.

> If it's conditionalized for cygwin, I can approve it.

That's what I was hoping for.

Thanks,
Jason

- Raw text -