Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 13:12:18 -0400
From: Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject: Re: Should sys/types.h include sys/sysmacros.h?
In-reply-to: <20020501145706.GF6736@redhat.com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <20020501171218.GH3160@tishler.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
References: <20020501125600 DOT GE3160 AT tishler DOT net>
 <20020501145706 DOT GF6736 AT redhat DOT com>

Chris,

On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:57:06AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 08:56:00AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >Should newlib's sys/types.h include sys/sysmacros.h (possibly only for
> >Cygwin)?
>
> If it makes things more linux compliant and there is no corresponding
> susv2 ruling, then go for it.

Cool.

> Could you send a patch to the newlib mailing list?

Yes, that was my plan.

> If it's conditionalized for cygwin, I can approve it.

That's what I was hoping for.

Thanks,
Jason