Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:54:18 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ok, the daemon has had feedback...
Message-ID:	<20020122035418.GA24302@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<08f201c1a2f7$87b914c0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<08f201c1a2f7$87b914c0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:47:35PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>which was: no impact when not running, broke tty's when running.
>
>I've fixed the tty issue.... so
>
>what next to get this accepted/further work required defined?

Anyone actually looked at the changes and evaluated the implementation?

I'd hoped for a little bit more actual testing, too.

Gary, are you using this on a day-to-day basis?

cgf

- Raw text -