Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:54:18 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ok, the daemon has had feedback... Message-ID: <20020122035418.GA24302@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <08f201c1a2f7$87b914c0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <08f201c1a2f7$87b914c0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:47:35PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >which was: no impact when not running, broke tty's when running. > >I've fixed the tty issue.... so > >what next to get this accepted/further work required defined? Anyone actually looked at the changes and evaluated the implementation? I'd hoped for a little bit more actual testing, too. Gary, are you using this on a day-to-day basis? cgf