Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 12 Apr 2001 19:25:33 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: snapshot and new test gcc?
Message-ID:	<20010412192533.D20863@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<02b501c0c3a6$4f7acfd0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<02b501c0c3a6$4f7acfd0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 09:14:21AM +1000

On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 09:14:21AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>    could I ask you to fire off a new snapshot? That'll let the pthreads
>users such as python, miniOrb etc get the new functions.

Done.

>If possible could you do a new test-build of gcc with posix threads
>enabled?

Um.  No.  I don't want to do this.  I have no extra cycles available for
experimenting with gcc.  I am also not going to release a version of gcc
with a reliance on a snapshot even if it is a test version.

cgf

- Raw text -