Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 19:25:33 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: snapshot and new test gcc? Message-ID: <20010412192533.D20863@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <02b501c0c3a6$4f7acfd0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <02b501c0c3a6$4f7acfd0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 09:14:21AM +1000 On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 09:14:21AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > could I ask you to fire off a new snapshot? That'll let the pthreads >users such as python, miniOrb etc get the new functions. Done. >If possible could you do a new test-build of gcc with posix threads >enabled? Um. No. I don't want to do this. I have no extra cycles available for experimenting with gcc. I am also not going to release a version of gcc with a reliance on a snapshot even if it is a test version. cgf