Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 2 Apr 2001 01:36:16 -0400
Message-Id:	<200104020536.BAA08763@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning:	envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au
CC:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
In-reply-to:
	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08EEA2 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
	(robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au)
Subject:	Re: New output from mount.exe
References:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08EEA2 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>

> I was meaning like
> \\\\ for \\, so that bash et al won't get confused. (as opposed to
> skipping the \\'s).

Why should bash care what mount prints?

- Raw text -