Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 01:36:16 -0400
Message-Id: <200104020536.BAA08763@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au
CC: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
In-reply-to: 
	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08EEA2 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
	(robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au)
Subject: Re: New output from mount.exe
References:  <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08EEA2 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>


> I was meaning like
> \\\\ for \\, so that bash et al won't get confused. (as opposed to
> skipping the \\'s).

Why should bash care what mount prints?