delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Hi! Thursday, 15 February, 2001 Christopher Faylor cgf AT redhat DOT com wrote: >>however. the reason is this fragment >> >> default: >> fg = default_color & (FOREGROUND_BLUE | FOREGROUND_GREEN | >> FOREGROUND_RED); >> bg = default_color & (BACKGROUND_BLUE | BACKGROUND_GREEN | >> BACKGROUND_RED | BACKGROUND_INTENSITY); >> bold = default_color & FOREGROUND_INTENSITY; >> break; >> >>in fhandler_console::char_command. shouldn't this code be eliminated? CF> Are you saying that the 666 is causing incorrect behavior? yes. when we scan \033[1;666m command, we first set fg and bg variables to correct "bold" values, an then we see 666 and quoted code reset fg and bg to the fixed values based on default_color. CF> If so, I think I agree. Why should cygwin be setting any CF> defaults at all if it doesn't understand the numeric code? i'll submit a patch. Egor. mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |