Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:16:40 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: setlogmask?
Message-ID:	<20010120001640.A18335@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20010119224729 DOT A1064 AT dothill DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<20010119224729.A1064@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:47:29PM -0500

On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:47:29PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>setlogmask was commented out on Mon Apr 13 23:15:13 1998 because Geoffrey
>Noer considered it an unused function.  Does anyone mind if I submit a
>patch to re-enable it.  In case you are wondering, Python "needs" it.

Submit away.  I don't really understand why it was commented out to
begin with.

cgf

- Raw text -