Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:16:40 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: setlogmask?
Message-ID: <20010120001640.A18335@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20010119224729 DOT A1064 AT dothill DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20010119224729.A1064@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:47:29PM -0500

On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:47:29PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>setlogmask was commented out on Mon Apr 13 23:15:13 1998 because Geoffrey
>Noer considered it an unused function.  Does anyone mind if I submit a
>patch to re-enable it.  In case you are wondering, Python "needs" it.

Submit away.  I don't really understand why it was commented out to
begin with.

cgf