Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2000/09/01/10:25:08
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:02:37AM +0400, Egor Duda wrote:
>Friday, 01 September, 2000 DJ Delorie dj AT delorie DOT com wrote:
>>> winsup/
>>> testsuite/
>>>
>>> This would make things more like the rest of the repository, I think.
>
>DD> OK with me, then.
>
>DD> You don't need Makefiles all over the testsuite. In fact, there are
>DD> *no* makefiles in the existing cygwin testsuite.
>
>yes, because all needed support is built as part of winsup/cygwin/
>build. but now i need to build yet another support lib. the question
>is where it's better be put. i see now that putting it in
>winsup/testsuite/ is not good idea, because this subdir will be
>processed by runtest too (if it's called without '--tool' switch). so
>i agree testsup/ direcory with test-support-library sources and
>headers should go somewhere else. but should it be winsup/testsup/ or
>winsup/cygwin/testsup/ ?
Whatever we do with the testsuite directory I don't want parts of it
leaking into other directories. If we are going to be moving
winsup/cygwin/testsuite to winsup/testsuite, that's fine. I just
want it to be self-contained. I don't think there is any reason
why this can't be the case. Take a look at gdb's test suite. It
has a 'lib' subdirectory with .c and .cc source files.
cgf
- Raw text -