Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 10:23:57 -0400
To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: testsuite
Message-ID: <20000901102357.B27551@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References: <20000831165024 DOT A15210 AT cygnus DOT com> <200008312055 DOT QAA25395 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000831170237 DOT B15144 AT cygnus DOT com> <200008312122 DOT RAA25605 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <106339243866 DOT 20000901110237 AT logos-m DOT ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <106339243866.20000901110237@logos-m.ru>; from deo@logos-m.ru on Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:02:37AM +0400

On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:02:37AM +0400, Egor Duda wrote:
>Friday, 01 September, 2000 DJ Delorie dj AT delorie DOT com wrote:
>>> winsup/
>>>   testsuite/
>>> 
>>> This would make things more like the rest of the repository, I think.
>
>DD> OK with me, then.
>
>DD> You don't need Makefiles all over the testsuite.  In fact, there are
>DD> *no* makefiles in the existing cygwin testsuite.
>
>yes,  because  all  needed  support is built as part of winsup/cygwin/
>build.  but  now i need to build yet another support lib. the question
>is   where  it's  better  be  put.  i  see  now  that  putting  it  in
>winsup/testsuite/  is  not  good  idea,  because  this  subdir will be
>processed  by runtest too (if it's called without '--tool' switch). so
>i  agree  testsup/  direcory  with  test-support-library  sources  and
>headers  should go somewhere else. but should it be winsup/testsup/ or
>winsup/cygwin/testsup/ ?

Whatever we do with the testsuite directory I don't want parts of it
leaking into other directories.  If we are going to be moving
winsup/cygwin/testsuite to winsup/testsuite, that's fine.  I just
want it to be self-contained.  I don't think there is any reason
why this can't be the case.  Take a look at gdb's test suite.  It
has a 'lib' subdirectory with .c and .cc source files.

cgf