delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
--- Kazuhiro Fujieda <fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp> wrote: > >>> On Sat, 11 Sep 1999 21:41:37 +0200 > >>> Corinna Vinschen <corinna AT vinschen DOT de> said: > > > The call to getlogin() is the same as a call to GetUserName() > > but if it fails, it returns 'unknown'. The original source of > > read_etc_passwd() sets 'Administrator' as fallback and this is > > the only difference. While the username is senseless on 9X > > systems, on NT 'Administrator' would be a better fallback than > > 'unknown'.So, why should it be changed then... > > Are there any cases that GetUserName() fails on NT ? I understand > GetUserName() fails mainly on 9X, and I don't want to see > 'Administrator' on 9x. But, on 9x everyone is the Administrator so the fallback is correct. === Earnie Boyd <mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com> Newbies, please visit <http://www.freeyellow.com/members5/gw32/index.html> (If you respond to the list, then please don't cc me) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |