Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <19990913122727.16494.rocketmail@web135.yahoomail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 05:27:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com Subject: Re: /etc/passwd emulation To: Kazuhiro Fujieda , cygwin-developers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote: > >>> On Sat, 11 Sep 1999 21:41:37 +0200 > >>> Corinna Vinschen said: > > > The call to getlogin() is the same as a call to GetUserName() > > but if it fails, it returns 'unknown'. The original source of > > read_etc_passwd() sets 'Administrator' as fallback and this is > > the only difference. While the username is senseless on 9X > > systems, on NT 'Administrator' would be a better fallback than > > 'unknown'.So, why should it be changed then... > > Are there any cases that GetUserName() fails on NT ? I understand > GetUserName() fails mainly on 9X, and I don't want to see > 'Administrator' on 9x. But, on 9x everyone is the Administrator so the fallback is correct. === Earnie Boyd Newbies, please visit (If you respond to the list, then please don't cc me) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com