Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:36:55 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: package offering: gnupg
Message-ID:	<20020608213655.GF15922@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3D01D259 DOT 9080508 AT scytek DOT de> <8657450619 DOT 20020608141448 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20020608154613 DOT GB15922 AT redhat DOT com> <3D0250BA DOT 3000201 AT netscape DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3D0250BA.3000201@netscape.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 02:45:14PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>I think Chuck better look at the buildscript, there seem to be a couple 
>of (unnecessary?)kludges throughout the script.  For instance, 
>re-autoconfilizing the autoscripts shouldn't be a necessary step in the 
>user build process.  You should do that ahead of time, delete the 
>autom4ate.cache and other garbage, then make a diff against the 
>results...  There are a few other things that could be improved in the 
>source package ( but I'll leave it to the veteran package maintainers to 
>comment ), but AFAICT the binary package works fine.

Thanks for looking at it.

cgf

- Raw text -