Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:36:55 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: package offering: gnupg Message-ID: <20020608213655.GF15922@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3D01D259 DOT 9080508 AT scytek DOT de> <8657450619 DOT 20020608141448 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20020608154613 DOT GB15922 AT redhat DOT com> <3D0250BA DOT 3000201 AT netscape DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D0250BA.3000201@netscape.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 02:45:14PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: >I think Chuck better look at the buildscript, there seem to be a couple >of (unnecessary?)kludges throughout the script. For instance, >re-autoconfilizing the autoscripts shouldn't be a necessary step in the >user build process. You should do that ahead of time, delete the >autom4ate.cache and other garbage, then make a diff against the >results... There are a few other things that could be improved in the >source package ( but I'll leave it to the veteran package maintainers to >comment ), but AFAICT the binary package works fine. Thanks for looking at it. cgf