Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3CAB28BA.5090600@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 03 Apr 2002 11:07:22 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
CC:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: move texmf-* out of test?
References:	<m34rit5aj1 DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>

Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> As tetex-beta-20001218-4 (now in curr) and texmf-*-20000804-2 seem to
> work well together, can we remove the test marker from texmf?  


You are the maintainer; it is your decision.

> I
> thought there was a three weeks period for test; who's keeping track
> of that?


I don't know of any hard rule about "three weeks" -- whatever you, as 
the maintainer, think is appropriate for your packages, is good.

--Chuck

- Raw text -