Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3CAB28BA.5090600@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 11:07:22 -0500
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
CC: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: move texmf-* out of test?
References: <m34rit5aj1 DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> As tetex-beta-20001218-4 (now in curr) and texmf-*-20000804-2 seem to
> work well together, can we remove the test marker from texmf?  


You are the maintainer; it is your decision.

> I
> thought there was a three weeks period for test; who's keeping track
> of that?


I don't know of any hard rule about "three weeks" -- whatever you, as 
the maintainer, think is appropriate for your packages, is good.

--Chuck