Mail Archives: cygwin-apps/2002/03/20/00:32:14

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: RE: And we have a xfree cygwin package.. (What are they called?)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:30:28 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>, <cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by id g2K5WD330367

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM

> I don't see any reason to delay adopting XFree86 into the 
> main setup. So, lets not worry about customizing anything or 
> offering alternate setup.ini's.

I don't see any reason either, but then I've been pushing for this for
>6 months.

The reason I'm suggesting have a test setup.ini is so that their
install-script can be tested a little bit...


- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019