Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: And we have a xfree cygwin package.. (What are they called?) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:30:28 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: content-class: urn:content-classes:message From: "Robert Collins" To: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2K5WD330367 > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM > I don't see any reason to delay adopting XFree86 into the > main setup. So, lets not worry about customizing anything or > offering alternate setup.ini's. I don't see any reason either, but then I've been pushing for this for >6 months. The reason I'm suggesting have a test setup.ini is so that their install-script can be tested a little bit... Rob