Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C8F1258.50600@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 13 Mar 2002 03:48:24 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com>
CC:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [PATCH suggestion] aclocal wrapper script loops forever if automake-devel or automake-stable is missing
References:	<416981789 DOT 20020312131817 AT syntrex DOT com>

Pavel Tsekov wrote:

> Hey, there! :)
> 
> Does the attached patch make any sense ? It prevents an infinite loop
> if either automake-devel or automake-stable is missing.
> 

Yes, it does -- of course, setup enforces that automake depends on 
automake-devel and automake-stable, so if you see this error it's 
because you've overridden setup.exe...

Or you set the AUTO_STABLE / AUTO_DEVEL environment variables (incorrectly).

I've incorporated your suggestions into the next version of the 
wrappers.  However, as a general note, there are a few problems with 
your submission:

1) you patched a generated file, not a source file (aclocal is created 
from aclocal.in in the automake -src package).

2) you only patched one of the files -- but all scripts exhibit this 
behavior.  You'd actually need to provide similar patches for

automake:
   aclocal.in
   automake.in
autoconf:
   autoconf.in
   autoupdate.in
   autoreconf.in
   autoheader.in
   autoscan.in
   ifnames.in
libtool:
   libtool.in
   libtoolize.in

3) No ChangeLog entry

I have done all of the above, so no worries this time.  However, next 
time...

--Chuck

- Raw text -