delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3c3fe1403c61034a@mel-rta7.wanadoo.fr> (added by mel-rta7.wanadoo.fr) |
Date: | Sat, 12 Jan 2002 08:09:52 +0200 (MET) |
From: | "J=?iso-8859-1?Q?=E9r=F4me-Georges-Michel BENOIT?=" <JGMBenoit AT wanadoo DOT fr> |
To: | <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: tetex-beta-20001218 available for testing |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g0C7A0e20963 |
>It doesn't seem like this package should be named tetex-beta-20001218. >Unless it is a modification of the sources from more than a year >ago, it should be renamed to a more recent date. >cgf The orignal name of main source is `tetex-beta-20001218': what I mean is that the date does correspond to the date of the source. The latest one is `tetex-beta-20011202' which available from CTAN: I guess I have to build it, but this operation should take some time and the 'list' asked me to rebuid the current cygwin package before that this new source was available. Hence the name `tetex-beta-20001218-2' for the latest cygwin tetex package. May I renamed the cygwin tetex package `tetex-betat-20001218-20020112-1' ? Thanks, Jerome
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |