Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3c3fe1403c61034a@mel-rta7.wanadoo.fr> (added by mel-rta7.wanadoo.fr)
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 08:09:52 +0200 (MET)
From: "J=?iso-8859-1?Q?=E9r=F4me-Georges-Michel BENOIT?=" <JGMBenoit AT wanadoo DOT fr>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:           Re: tetex-beta-20001218 available for testing
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g0C7A0e20963

>It doesn't seem like this package should be named
tetex-beta-20001218.
>Unless it is a modification of the sources from more than a year
>ago, it should be renamed to a more recent date.

>cgf

The orignal name of main source is `tetex-beta-20001218':
what I mean is that the date does correspond to the date of the source.
The latest one is `tetex-beta-20011202' which available
from CTAN: I guess I have to build it,
but this operation should take some time
and the  'list' asked me to rebuid the current cygwin package before that this new source was available.
Hence the name `tetex-beta-20001218-2' for the latest
cygwin tetex package.

May I renamed the cygwin tetex package `tetex-betat-20001218-20020112-1' ?

Thanks,
Jerome