Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<133301c196a1$7e4f93d0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Gerrit P. Haase @ cygwin-apps" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<911C684A29ACD311921800508B7293BA037D2950 AT cnmail> <20020104230953 DOT GD21112 AT redhat DOT com> <2233544183 DOT 20020105021546 AT familiehaase DOT de> <102001c19586$170c4180$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <970791232 DOT 20020105123633 AT familiehaase DOT de>
Subject:	Re: whois package
Date:	Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:01:28 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	06 Jan 2002 11:03:29.0072 (UTC) FILETIME=[C5839300:01C196A1]

===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gp AT familiehaase DOT de>
>
> I thought three votes pro are enough, so the decision was made, I took
> a look and examined the package;)

Ah. I understand.

> BTW, I voted pro whois too.

Yes. I had the impression (perhaps wrongly) that you were associating
the quality-of-packaging with the acceptance-of-package. I just wanted
it to be clear....

The packaging must meet the various criteria to be uploaded, but I don't
expect potential maintainers to do all the hard work until the group has
accepted the package itself.

Rob

- Raw text -