Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <133301c196a1$7e4f93d0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Gerrit P. Haase @ cygwin-apps" References: <911C684A29ACD311921800508B7293BA037D2950 AT cnmail> <20020104230953 DOT GD21112 AT redhat DOT com> <2233544183 DOT 20020105021546 AT familiehaase DOT de> <102001c19586$170c4180$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <970791232 DOT 20020105123633 AT familiehaase DOT de> Subject: Re: whois package Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:01:28 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jan 2002 11:03:29.0072 (UTC) FILETIME=[C5839300:01C196A1] === ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerrit P. Haase" > > I thought three votes pro are enough, so the decision was made, I took > a look and examined the package;) Ah. I understand. > BTW, I voted pro whois too. Yes. I had the impression (perhaps wrongly) that you were associating the quality-of-packaging with the acceptance-of-package. I just wanted it to be clear.... The packaging must meet the various criteria to be uploaded, but I don't expect potential maintainers to do all the hard work until the group has accepted the package itself. Rob