Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C20CABF.EC49754B@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:13:35 -0700
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
Organization:	-ENOENT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
References:	<CCD084B0E779D411A70300508B6622260361F99B AT exchukahis02 DOT experian DOT co DOT uk> <3C20BA86 DOT 6000001 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011219161644 DOT GB23322 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> Is there anything similar to this in Red Hat, Debian, SuSE, etc.?

Well, /etc/profile, hosts, passwd, group and other core config files are
owned by the 'setup' package in Red Hat Linux.  Then there's the
initscripts package for the rc.d directory.  And most of the other files
are owned by individual packages, like bash owns /etc/bashrc.

My point is, RHL doesn't set any particular standard.  If anything, I'd
give /etc/bash_completions to bash -- it's only useful when you install
bash, and you have to upgrade bash to 2.05 or higher to use the
completions.
-- 
= ICBM Address: 36.8274040 N, 108.0204086 W, alt. 1714m

- Raw text -