Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C20CABF.EC49754B@etr-usa.com> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:13:35 -0700 From: Warren Young Organization: -ENOENT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units) References: <3C20BA86 DOT 6000001 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011219161644 DOT GB23322 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Is there anything similar to this in Red Hat, Debian, SuSE, etc.? Well, /etc/profile, hosts, passwd, group and other core config files are owned by the 'setup' package in Red Hat Linux. Then there's the initscripts package for the rc.d directory. And most of the other files are owned by individual packages, like bash owns /etc/bashrc. My point is, RHL doesn't set any particular standard. If anything, I'd give /etc/bash_completions to bash -- it's only useful when you install bash, and you have to upgrade bash to 2.05 or higher to use the completions. -- = ICBM Address: 36.8274040 N, 108.0204086 W, alt. 1714m