delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:18:26 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: FW: bash completion (was: RE: Units) |
Message-ID: | <20011219161826.GC23322@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F803794E78 AT exchukthis02 DOT experian DOT co DOT uk> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F803794E78@exchukthis02.experian.co.uk> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.23.1i |
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:58:55PM -0000, Ebrey, Carl wrote: >Gah! I meant to send this to the list but I replied and so it went to >Earnie instead. Sorry about that... > >Okay, I could be really wrong here but from what I can see, >http://cygwin.com/setup.html doesn't mention any "Shell Utils" category. >What it does quite clearly state is, "Please do not invent a new category >without checking with the cygwin-apps mailing list first". Does that mean >that we should consider that to be a proposal for a new category? :) As Chuck has pointed out, we are clearly not going to approve a category which is essentially a concatenation of two existing categories. And, it doesn't make sense to me to use this particular package for a departure from current practices. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |