Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:18:26 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: FW: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Message-ID: <20011219161826.GC23322@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F803794E78 AT exchukthis02 DOT experian DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F803794E78@exchukthis02.experian.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:58:55PM -0000, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
>Gah!  I meant to send this to the list but I replied and so it went to
>Earnie instead.  Sorry about that...
>
>Okay, I could be really wrong here but from what I can see,
>http://cygwin.com/setup.html doesn't mention any "Shell Utils" category.
>What it does quite clearly state is, "Please do not invent a new category
>without checking with the cygwin-apps mailing list first".  Does that mean
>that we should consider that to be a proposal for a new category? :)

As Chuck has pointed out, we are clearly not going to approve a category
which is essentially a concatenation of two existing categories.  And, it
doesn't make sense to me to use this particular package for a departure
from current practices.

cgf