Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C0E16B1.73C73273@syntrex.com>
Date:	Wed, 05 Dec 2001 13:44:33 +0100
From:	Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: string.h vs string.h usage
References:	<3C0E0C4C DOT 73A1750D AT syntrex DOT com> <15915798356 DOT 20011205152138 AT logos-m DOT ru> <3C0E12BA DOT 3843123E AT syntrex DOT com>

I want to say that I didnt mean to start a 
general string.h vs string.h discussion (flame).
I want to discuss the setup.exe and mingw case.
strings.h works in winsup environment build,
but not virgin mingw. That's my point. So 
should this be changed ?

- Raw text -