Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3C0E16B1.73C73273@syntrex.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 13:44:33 +0100
From: Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: string.h vs string.h usage
References: <3C0E0C4C DOT 73A1750D AT syntrex DOT com> <15915798356 DOT 20011205152138 AT logos-m DOT ru> <3C0E12BA DOT 3843123E AT syntrex DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I want to say that I didnt mean to start a 
general string.h vs string.h discussion (flame).
I want to discuss the setup.exe and mingw case.
strings.h works in winsup environment build,
but not virgin mingw. That's my point. So 
should this be changed ?