Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:55:52 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [RFP] misc from cygutils
Message-ID:	<20011129155552.GD11595@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKIEKFCHAA DOT g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <3C05C414 DOT 8090608 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011129112403 DOT F24007 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20011129112403.F24007@cygbert.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:24:03AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 12:13:56AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>> 
>> > 
>> > This is all well and good, but the real question remains: How much cyg could a
>> > cygchuck chuck if a cygchuck could chuck cyg?
>> > 
>> > Ok, that was bad even by my low standards ;-).
>> 
>> 
>> Groan.  I've had to listen to that silly rhyme since preschool.
>> 
>> Okay, that tears it.  cygchuck is out.  :-)
>
>That's a pity.  As Chris I do actually like it.  Perhaps because
>I'm a Disney comics fan and "cygchuck" reminds me of the junior
>woodchucks.  So "cygchuck" has a very positive connotation.  At
>least to me.

It works!  I can be Uncle Scrooge McDuck in this scenario.

cgf

- Raw text -