Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:55:52 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [RFP] misc from cygutils Message-ID: <20011129155552.GD11595@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3C05C414 DOT 8090608 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011129112403 DOT F24007 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011129112403.F24007@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:24:03AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 12:13:56AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >> >> >> Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >> >> > >> > This is all well and good, but the real question remains: How much cyg could a >> > cygchuck chuck if a cygchuck could chuck cyg? >> > >> > Ok, that was bad even by my low standards ;-). >> >> >> Groan. I've had to listen to that silly rhyme since preschool. >> >> Okay, that tears it. cygchuck is out. :-) > >That's a pity. As Chris I do actually like it. Perhaps because >I'm a Disney comics fan and "cygchuck" reminds me of the junior >woodchucks. So "cygchuck" has a very positive connotation. At >least to me. It works! I can be Uncle Scrooge McDuck in this scenario. cgf