Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C04AC25.90100@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 04:19:33 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
CC:	Joshua Franklin <joshuadfranklin AT yahoo DOT com>, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: attn: which, bzip2,gzip maintainers (was Re: some problems with setup.ini)
References:	<20011126213622 DOT 71874 DOT qmail AT web20004 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <1006938304 DOT 712 DOT 23 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>

Robert Collins wrote:

>>And, IMHO, bzip2 gzip unzip zip are all similar enough
>>to be in the same category. Or not.
>>
> 
> Agreed. Shall we get rid of the separate archivers category?


fine by me.

--Chuck (zip, unzip)

- Raw text -