Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3C04AC25.90100@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 04:19:33 -0500
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
CC: Joshua Franklin <joshuadfranklin AT yahoo DOT com>, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: attn: which, bzip2,gzip maintainers (was Re: some problems with	setup.ini)
References: <20011126213622 DOT 71874 DOT qmail AT web20004 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <1006938304 DOT 712 DOT 23 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Robert Collins wrote:

>>And, IMHO, bzip2 gzip unzip zip are all similar enough
>>to be in the same category. Or not.
>>
> 
> Agreed. Shall we get rid of the separate archivers category?


fine by me.

--Chuck (zip, unzip)