Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C04AB07.C2EDDC5C@syntrex.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:14:47 +0100
From:	Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [RFP] misc from cygutils
References:	<3C032ACF DOT 2040006 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <26215371467 DOT 20011127093129 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3C0429FB DOT 335A4A78 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <143300493787 DOT 20011128091011 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3C04AA81 DOT 5080804 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>

Charles Wilson wrote:
> 
> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> 
> >>>>2) can anybody come up with a better name?  This package is intended to
> >>>>be a grab-bag of simple utilities (each executable requires only a
> >>>>single source code file of moderate length).
> 
> >
> > Then maybe 'cygutils' would be a good name?
> 
> Urk...but I already used that name for my "world-famous" website. <g>
> Wouldn't that lead to confusion?  Or would it actually be LESS confusing
>   for folks since 'cygutils' == me == the misc package (well, mostly)?

What about cygwin-helpers or cyghelpers ?

- Raw text -