Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3C04AB07.C2EDDC5C@syntrex.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:14:47 +0100
From: Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [RFP] misc from cygutils
References: <3C032ACF DOT 2040006 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <26215371467 DOT 20011127093129 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3C0429FB DOT 335A4A78 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <143300493787 DOT 20011128091011 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3C04AA81 DOT 5080804 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Charles Wilson wrote:
> 
> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> 
> >>>>2) can anybody come up with a better name?  This package is intended to
> >>>>be a grab-bag of simple utilities (each executable requires only a
> >>>>single source code file of moderate length).
> 
> >
> > Then maybe 'cygutils' would be a good name?
> 
> Urk...but I already used that name for my "world-famous" website. <g>
> Wouldn't that lead to confusion?  Or would it actually be LESS confusing
>   for folks since 'cygutils' == me == the misc package (well, mostly)?

What about cygwin-helpers or cyghelpers ?