Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup testers wanted
From:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	Paul Garceau <pgarceau AT qwest DOT net>
Cc:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<3BE1AA57.14357.15CC43E@localhost>
References:	<20011102031557 DOT 74466 DOT qmail AT web20009 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
	<3BE1AA57 DOT 14357 DOT 15CC43E AT localhost>
X-Mailer:	Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release)
Date:	02 Nov 2001 17:33:50 +1100
Message-Id:	<1004682831.5402.123.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	02 Nov 2001 06:38:06.0165 (UTC) FILETIME=[EDDF0850:01C16368]

On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 15:02, Paul G. wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1 Nov 2001 at 22:44, the Illustrious Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 07:15:57PM -0800, Joshua Franklin wrote:
> > >> Here's what you need to do. Subscribe to cygwin-apps
> > >OK, I've done that and am moving the discussion there.
> > >
> 
> > I hope that he hasn't submitted a better
> > description that I missed when I generated setup.ini.  I agree that the
> > current description is misleading.
> > 
> > It does raise the whole X11 issue, though.  I'd like to include the X11
> > stuff in setup.exe, too.  Should we wait until we've ironed out all of
> > the bugs here first and then ask them what they want or should we start
> > making noises about this now in cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com?
> 
> 	Mmm...think it should stay here for now.  X11 is complex enough by itself ;-).  (I am from 
> the old school which added X11 support to Cygwin back around v17 and v18 or so...;-))
> 
> 	Would be a good idea to hammer out dependencies, etc. here I think.

Yes. 

Rob

- Raw text -