Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: setup testers wanted From: Robert Collins To: Paul Garceau Cc: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <3BE1AA57.14357.15CC43E@localhost> References: <20011102031557 DOT 74466 DOT qmail AT web20009 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <3BE1AA57 DOT 14357 DOT 15CC43E AT localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Nov 2001 17:33:50 +1100 Message-Id: <1004682831.5402.123.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Nov 2001 06:38:06.0165 (UTC) FILETIME=[EDDF0850:01C16368] On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 15:02, Paul G. wrote: > > > On 1 Nov 2001 at 22:44, the Illustrious Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 07:15:57PM -0800, Joshua Franklin wrote: > > >> Here's what you need to do. Subscribe to cygwin-apps > > >OK, I've done that and am moving the discussion there. > > > > > > I hope that he hasn't submitted a better > > description that I missed when I generated setup.ini. I agree that the > > current description is misleading. > > > > It does raise the whole X11 issue, though. I'd like to include the X11 > > stuff in setup.exe, too. Should we wait until we've ironed out all of > > the bugs here first and then ask them what they want or should we start > > making noises about this now in cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com? > > Mmm...think it should stay here for now. X11 is complex enough by itself ;-). (I am from > the old school which added X11 support to Cygwin back around v17 and v18 or so...;-)) > > Would be a good idea to hammer out dependencies, etc. here I think. Yes. Rob