Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:10:16 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: new 'temp' directory in CVS cinstall contains dependency WIP
Message-ID:	<20010924171016.A31721@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3BADE0ED DOT 9932 DOT 41CB3181 AT localhost> <0b1301c14424$c07af6c0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<0b1301c14424$c07af6c0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 09:41:57PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>> No:
>> http://packages.debian.org/stable/interpreters/gawk.html
>
>Thank you!. Ego is now being readjusted :]. Anyway, IMO this validates
>my point about delegating the maintenance of this info to the
>maintainers.

Actually, where "base" is concerned this is clearly not a situation
where an individual developer gets to decide.

Regardless, currently, if someone wants to remove "gawk" from the base they
ONLY HAVE TO REMOVE IT FROM SETUP.INI.

cgf

- Raw text -