Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:10:16 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: new 'temp' directory in CVS cinstall contains dependency WIP Message-ID: <20010924171016.A31721@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3BADE0ED DOT 9932 DOT 41CB3181 AT localhost> <0b1301c14424$c07af6c0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0b1301c14424$c07af6c0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 09:41:57PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >> No: >> http://packages.debian.org/stable/interpreters/gawk.html > >Thank you!. Ego is now being readjusted :]. Anyway, IMO this validates >my point about delegating the maintenance of this info to the >maintainers. Actually, where "base" is concerned this is clearly not a situation where an individual developer gets to decide. Regardless, currently, if someone wants to remove "gawk" from the base they ONLY HAVE TO REMOVE IT FROM SETUP.INI. cgf